Sunan Abi Dawud 4626 · Project Hadith

4626sunnah.com 42:31

حدثنا هلال بن بشر، قال: حدثنا عثمان بن عثمان، عن عثمان البتي، قال: «ما فسر الحسن آية قط إلا عن الإثبات»

The English translation is not shown here: its source is not yet cleared for public display.

Sunan Abi Dawud, vol. 4, p. 205, no. 4626. Not yet checked against the printed edition.

Status

No grading recorded yet

No scholar's grading of this hadith is loaded.

Chain of narratorsBy year of death

أبو داودCompiler · Identified · d. 275 AH
Identified
Named by the text itself.
Who
سليمان بن الأشعث بن إسحاق بن بشير بن شداد بن عمرو بن عمران ، وقيل : سليمان بن الأشعث بن بشر بن شداد ، وقيل : سليمان بن الأشعث بن شداد بن عمرو بن عامر
d. 275 AH, per Itqan narrator index (internal disambiguation only)
Why this match
- The compiler of the work.
حدثنا · ḥaddathanā, “he narrated to us”
هلال بن بشرProposed match · d. 246 AH
Proposed match
The importer's suggestion, not yet confirmed by a scholar.
Proposed identity
هلال بن بشر بن محبوب بن هلال بن ذكوان
d. 246 AH, per Itqan narrator index (internal disambiguation only)
Why this match
- 2 Itqan profiles carry the name form 'هلال بن بشر'. This one's recorded teachers and students include the narrator after in this chain. The identity rests on that link, so the link is not independent evidence of continuity.
Other candidates considered
- هلال بن بشر d. 241 AH
What the critics say
- إمام مسجد يونس الأحدب ثقةIbn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Taqrib al-Tahdhib, p. 575, entry 7329 · not yet checked against the printed edition
- ثقةReliable · al-Dhahabī, al-Kashif, p. 340, entry 5992 · not yet checked against the printed edition
These are said of the proposed identity, which a scholar has not yet confirmed.
حدثنا · ḥaddathanā, “he narrated to us”
عثمان بن عثمانProposed match · d. 181–190 AH
Proposed match
The importer's suggestion, not yet confirmed by a scholar.
Proposed identity
عثمان بن عثمان
d. 181–190 AH, per Itqan narrator index (internal disambiguation only)
Why this match
- Only Itqan profile 7942 carries the name form 'عثمان بن عثمان'.
What the critics say
- صدوق ربما وهمIbn Ḥajar al-ʿAsqalānī, Taqrib al-Tahdhib, p. 385, entry 4500 · not yet checked against the printed edition
- وثقهأحمد, al-Kashif, p. 11, entry 3723 · not yet checked against the printed edition
These are said of the proposed identity, which a scholar has not yet confirmed.
عن · ʿan, “from”
عثمان البتيProposed match · d. 143 AH
Proposed match
The importer's suggestion, not yet confirmed by a scholar.
Proposed identity
عثمان بن مسلم : وقيل : أسلم ، ويقال : عثمان بن مسلم بن جرموز ، ويقال : عثمان بن سليمان بن جرموز
d. 143 AH, per Itqan narrator index (internal disambiguation only)
Why this match
- 2 Itqan profiles carry the name form 'عثمان البتي'. This one's recorded teachers and students include the narrator before in this chain. The identity rests on that link, so the link is not independent evidence of continuity.
Other candidates considered
- عثمان البتي no death date
What the critics say
No verdict loaded for this narrator yet.
عن · ʿan, “from”
الإثباتNot identified
Not identified
The name as written, and nothing more.

Names are as the text writes them; Latin-script names are not in the data yet (OPEN-33). Open a name to see who it may be and what the critics say.

System check · computed, not a ruling

Ruleset: Default rules for rating a chain v1 (draft)

عثمان بن عثمان: a critic notes wahm.
الإثبات: not identified, so the links around this name are not checked.
أبو داود from هلال بن بشر: no biographical source loaded lists this teacher and student.
عثمان بن عثمان from عثمان البتي: no biographical source loaded lists this teacher and student.

Combined rating: The ruleset and vocabularies are drafts awaiting the client's scholars. (OPEN-15)

These are leads for a scholar to review, not results.

Identified

Who

Why this match

Proposed match

Proposed identity

Why this match

Other candidates considered

What the critics say

Proposed match

Proposed identity

Why this match

What the critics say

Proposed match

Proposed identity

Why this match

Other candidates considered

What the critics say

Not identified